"Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > > ... > > Yes, this would be a good thing. I'm also talking with John Aycock about > his elegant SPARK toolkit for generating Earley-algorithm parsers. Once that > comes out of beta, I would consider it a core-library candidate. I pointed one of my co-workers at Spark and he loved the lexer but said that the parser ended up being too slow to be useful. I didn't know enough about the Earley-algorithm to suggest how he could re-organize his grammar to optimize for it. If naive Python programmers cannot generate usable parsers then it may not be appropriate for the standard library. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus The calculus and the rich body of mathematical analysis to which it gave rise made modern science possible, but it was the algorithm that made the modern world possible. - The Advent of the Algorithm (pending), by David Berlinski
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4