paul wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
> >=20
> > I've spent amount as much time on generating automated statement and =
branch
> > coverage as I can afford for the next few days. At this point I =
think I
> > have it generating a reasonable facsimile of useful output.
>=20
> I may have missed email about this during my email troubles yesterday,
> but why aren't we doing coverage testing of Python code too? Or am I
> missing that link?
from Skip's original mail:
/.../ I would also like to
adjust the regrtest.py stuff to generate statement coverage for .py =
files
using my trace module: =
http://www.musi-cal.com/~skip/python/trace.py.
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4