Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > I'm not convinced this delay is wholly a bad thing. Did Barry ever
> > track down the mysterious crashes he was seeing from running the test
> > suite? And it's more time to experiment with the garbage collection,
> > hunt for SRE bugs, and so forth.
>
> But that's what beta releases are for, right? The result now is that
> fewer people will try out the code than if it were released today, and
> the final release will undoubtedly be delayed again.
Guido, what about reverting the version number to 2.0a3 ?
We're still not in a beta stage, but there *is* a new version ready,
which, if not beta, should be an alpha. We're used to see the version
bumped a day or two before the release.
--
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4