Greg Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:53:31PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > > Why was the change that occurred in revision 2.31 reverted? Accident? > > > > > > The change log said: > > > Jack Jansen: Use include "" instead of <>; and staticforward declarations > > > > Accident... I'll revert that change. > > This is symptomatic of people not being careful with their CVS usage. > > *ALWAYS* do a "cvs update" before any commits. If the file has changed while > you're working on it, CVS will merge the changes in with yours. You will be > notified if there were any conflicts. > > But this is a MUST. We've seen this reversal of changes twice now. Only > through the careful eye of some -checkins watchers has that fact turned up. > If those people weren't watching, we'd be lost. > > If you're going to commit changes to Python, then please take the > responsibility to use CVS correctly. Hey, Greg, stay cool :-) The accident happened because I had to modify Trent's patch to make it apply correctly and I forgot to update the *copy* of the CVS tree in which I edited the changes. I always do a cvs update to my local CVS version before the checkins, in fact, the small script I posted to this list does the checking for me and won't accept the checkins if the local version is out of sync. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4