On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:07:47AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > >>>>> "MH" == Mark Hammond <mhammond@skippinet.com.au> writes: > > MH> [I wishing mailing-lists would agree on how they handle > MH> reply-to :-] > > It's fundamentally broken, but the problem is in the mail readers > (MUA). There's no header (that I'm aware of) that portably tells an > MUA - "Hey, for a group follow up, don't go to the original list, go > to THIS one instead, but for an individual followup (i.e. reply) still > address that to the original author." > > This is one reason why munging reply-to is evil. But in this case > we've agreed that following up to python-dev is more important than > preserving the ability to reply to the author. What about the Mail-Followup-To header? That can be helpful for some newsreaders (e.g. Mutt). Dunno how many observe it. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4