Fredrik Lundh wrote on 948314616:
> > In 1.6, I should do it this way:
> > '\t'.join(s)
> >
> > I think it would be better to have that method on the *list*:
> > s.join('\t')
> >
> > That's more clear, isn't it?
>
> what if "s" is a tuple? an array? a user-defined
> sequence type?
I understand. Thanks for your answers.
regards,
Gerrit.
--
Please correct any bad English you encounter in my email message!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- http://www.geekcode.com
Version: 3.12
GCS dpu s-:-- a14 C++++>$ UL++ P--- L+++ E--- W++ N o? K? w--- !O !M !V PS+ PE?
Y? PGP-- t- 5? X? R- tv- b+(++) DI D+ G++ !e !r !y
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4