> In 1.6, I should do it this way: > '\t'.join(s) >=20 > I think it would be better to have that method on the *list*: > s.join('\t') >=20 > That's more clear, isn't it? what if "s" is a tuple? an array? a user-defined sequence type? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4