[DA] > > > On the other hand, I do think that it might be nice to have that > > > sort of hook in the rich array world... [me] > > Really? The min/max functions already do all their looping in C. [DA] > Right, but it might make sense to define min() on an array to mean > something different than what min-the-builtin could guess from whatever > __lt__ returns -- In fact, IIRC, min() on an array which implemented > rich comparisons would raise an exception. I don't want to specify the > semantics now (arrays are weird sequences), I just appreciate the hook. > The semantics would probably depend on the flavor of array one wanted to > use. You're right. I bet Moshe is already coding... (Tip: you could reuse the same flag bit and simply rename it a bit, rather than having separate flag bits. The binary compatibility requirement is only between released versions, not between CVS versions.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4