> > On the other hand, I do think that it might be nice to have that sort of > > hook in the rich array world... > > Really? The min/max functions already do all their looping in C. Right, but it might make sense to define min() on an array to mean something different than what min-the-builtin could guess from whatever __lt__ returns -- In fact, IIRC, min() on an array which implemented rich comparisons would raise an exception. I don't want to specify the semantics now (arrays are weird sequences), I just appreciate the hook. The semantics would probably depend on the flavor of array one wanted to use. > [I guess you get to worry about the older brother while your wife > takes care of the newborn? :-)] Got it it one. --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4