Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > MAL: > > > Hmm, I'd say it doesn't hurt leaving .append() as it is until > > > 2.0. > > /F: > > fwiw, I definitely agree. I've spotted too many > > places where this change cause a program to > > silently misbehave, rather than blow up (PIL's > > JPEG plugin is just one example...). > > Sigh... I think you've got a wrong impression here: this is not so much a design question, it's a timing problem: two months are not enough to get all our software ready for 1.6 ... -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4