A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-February/002302.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: RFC: malloc cleanup

[Python-Dev] Re: RFC: malloc cleanup [Python-Dev] Re: RFC: malloc cleanupFred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake@acm.org
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:50:08 -0500 (EST)
Jack Jansen writes:
 > One point to think of, with the malloc cleanup: how many places are there 
 > where Python allocates something that is passed to some packages which then 
 > takes ownership of it (and ultimately free()s it)? And the other way around?
 > 
 > For these cases we should probably continue to use malloc()/free() to be on 
 > the safe side.

  Yes; that would be the only way to handle that if it doesn't provide 
any way to control the deallocation.  And if it does, you can still
use malloc & free.  Good enough for me!


  -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.	  <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4