Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-February/002286.html below:

[Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[Greg]
> One argument (of course) is stability. I don't see that as a problem =
in
> the case of moving modules.
>=20
> Personally, I'm okay with a partial move. I don't think that we'll be =
able
> to find proper packaging for everything. Let's shift the modules, =
review
> what's left, shift some more, etc. Lather/rinse/repeat.

you obviously don't plan to write Python books in
the foreseeable future :-)

</F>

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4