A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-February/002282.html below:

[Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal)

[Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal) [Python-Dev] package reorg in 1.6 (was: concrete proposal)Barry A. Warsaw bwarsaw@cnri.reston.va.us (Barry A. Warsaw)
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:33:47 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> "GS" == Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:

    GS> Personally, I'm okay with a partial move. I don't think that
    GS> we'll be able to find proper packaging for everything. Let's
    GS> shift the modules, review what's left, shift some more,
    GS> etc. Lather/rinse/repeat.

    GS> Even if we don't "complete the move", then we've still
    GS> *improved* the situation.

I agree.  There will be some modules which can clearly be grouped
together, and others that'll take some head scratching (or worse,
artificial conglomerificationating).  Let's do the ones that make
sense and see how far we get.  We'll hold the nice fat `misc' package
for 1.7 :)

-Barry



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4