On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > I'm all for re-organizing the library using packages. I don't think > I'm in favoring of doing some of it now, and some of it later. Rather > than moving modules into the network package (good name), I'd > hold off and do full packaging for 1.7. Python 1.6 is on a short release schedule, mostly just waiting for Unicode and distutils to arrive. If we have time/inclination to get stuff in before that occurs, and we believe it is the Right Thing, then why wait? That seems rather artificial. One argument (of course) is stability. I don't see that as a problem in the case of moving modules. Personally, I'm okay with a partial move. I don't think that we'll be able to find proper packaging for everything. Let's shift the modules, review what's left, shift some more, etc. Lather/rinse/repeat. Even if we don't "complete the move", then we've still *improved* the situation. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4