Moshe> Can we please, pretty please with cream on top, start using
Moshe> packages in the standard distribution? We can do it backwards
Moshe> compatibly, with something like
Moshe> internet/
Moshe> protocol/
Moshe> httplib.py
Moshe> and httplib.py which does
Moshe> from internet.protocol.httplib import *?
Moshe> Put new stuff only in packages, and that way we could have a large
Moshe> distribution, without a lot of top-level name clutter.
Moshe> Anyone for? Against? Going to add me to their kill-files<wink>?
For. Besides the reasons Moshe indicated, it also serves as an educational
tool. New Python programmers will get more comfortable with writing
packages faster if they are already comfortable using them.
Skip Montanaro | http://www.mojam.com/
skip@mojam.com | http://www.musi-cal.com/
"Languages that change by catering to the tastes of non-users tend not to do
so well." - Doug Landauer
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4