On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh writes:
> > (personally, I'd like to have xmlrpclib.py and soaplib.py
> > in the core, but that can wait for 1.6.1)
>
> These make a lot of sense, especially once we coerce Guido to accept
> Paul's expat bindings so that we can have some real XML support.
While I do enjoy having all this stuff with the core distribution, I have
one nit to pick. (Relevant more to 1.7 then 1.6, but worth keeping in
mind). Can we please, pretty please with cream on top, start using
packages in the standard distribution? We can do it backwards compatibly,
with something like
internet/
protocol/
httplib.py
and httplib.py which does
from internet.protocol.httplib import *?
Put new stuff only in packages, and that way we could have a large
distribution, without a lot of top-level name clutter.
Anyone for? Against? Going to add me to their kill-files<wink>?
--
Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>.
INTERNET: Learn what you know.
Share what you don't.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4