On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Trent Mick wrote: >... > Unfortunately, the couple of examples that I picked to show that some > improper sizeof() assumptions still existed in the code included the id() > function. I did not mean to dwell on id() but rather that I thought it would > be reasonable that the Python core should run identically on (A) Trillian > (Linux64) on itanium (Intel64) and on (B) Win64 on itanium. Maybe not. Not a problem. If you find more, then please bring them up! As I mentioned before, Python has been running on 64-bit platforms for at least three years (at Microsoft, we had to get it running on the Alpha in Fall, 1996, so that we could ship Microsoft Merchant Server 1.0). Apparently, we never used the id() function :-) So... if you find anything, then they're bugs to be fixed! Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4