Greg Stein wrote: > People do use the id() value when they are printing a repr() of = objects. > Those uses may overflow, though, because people are using '%d' or '%x' > format codes. It should be %s. %s doesn't hexify. cannot be that hard to fix %d and %x to work also for longs, can it? > > Taking it as a given that Python should be made to run on the = various 64-bit > > platforms, >=20 > Yes, that is a given. Python has been running on Alpha processors for = a > long time now; I'd say you found bugs rather than semantic problems. footnote: assert Unix in (LP32, LP64), according to the single Unix specification (and if you dig up their rationale, you'll see why everything else is totally braindead -- I'm usually no Microsoft basher, but this really pisses me off) > In other words, rather than change the numeric model for what is a = small > problem, just change the small problem. agreed. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4