M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Should I add these, Guido ? -- I'd rather stick with predefined > macros than cook my own. > The AC_C_INLINE would be esp. interesting here: > I think this could be used a lot for those tiny function which > just apply a type check and then return some object attribute > value. umm. since inline isn't really part of ANSI C, that means that you'll end up having possibly non-inlined code in header files, right? (I use inline agressively inside modules, except for really critical things that absolutely definitively must be inlined -- look in PIL to see what I mean...) > The AC_C_CONST frightens me a bit: the Unicode code uses "const" > a lot to make sure compilers can do the right optimizations. Are > there compilers out there which do not handle "const" correctly ? not sure about this; I just copied the list from PIL, and should probably have left this one out. I've don't think I've ever used it, and afaik, 1.6 will no longer support non-ANSI compilers anyway... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4