Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > Absolutely. If string-based standard exceptions are removed for 1.6, > we need a fool-proof way of getting exceptions.py. Remember, my first > attempt at this stuff made that Python code a BACS[*] that got > exec'd. I'm sure there are better ways of doing that now, and I think > exceptions.py has settled down enough to warrant cooling it for 1.6. let's just make it a built-in module. I have a 95% complete "exceptions.c" implementation somewhere. I'll take a look. (for more info, cc effbot@telia.com. GvR won't add the effbot to this list before SRE is finished ;-) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4