> I assume you'll get a similar response from many people: hopefully, > for each patch it will either get booed automatically (hey! I just added > braces instead of indentation to the parser) or will interest someone. The thing here that makes me slightly uncomfortable is how to keep track of patches that nobody picks up. a Jitterbug database would nicely do this, but I agree that it's inconvenient and overkill for other reasons. Perhaps we could use the "Linus Torvalds' inbox algorithm"? (When it overflows he deletes everything; "if it was important they'll send it again.") --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4