> Ummmm...would this be the wrong time to ask how the redesign contest is > going on? I haven't seen any submissions. Maybe Barry has? > > Probably a separate list. xemacs.org runs a xemacs-patches mailing > > list with a replybot on it that scans for patches. It sends back a > > different response based on whether it finds a patch or not. Then > > there's a group of lieutenants that keep an eye on the patches and > > work out their applicability. We could set something like that up > > fairly easily. > > A definite aye vote, though perhaps that's an overkill. As long as we're > comparing other Free Software projects, let me just note that on > linux-kernel, patches are part of the regular discussion. Whoever feels > like it, runs a modified kernel, and reports the result. Patches are then > chosen (in part) by the responses of people who have tried them out -- a > very good QA mechanism. Just to brainstorm about the process. Good point. At the moment I am the sole arbiter for patches, and I'm tired of it. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4