On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > I'm willing to put the entire python.org web site under CVS. This > would at least make it easier for others to send us patches to the .ht > files against the latest revisions. Is there any interest in this? > It wouldn't take me long. Ummmm...would this be the wrong time to ask how the redesign contest is going on? > Probably a separate list. xemacs.org runs a xemacs-patches mailing > list with a replybot on it that scans for patches. It sends back a > different response based on whether it finds a patch or not. Then > there's a group of lieutenants that keep an eye on the patches and > work out their applicability. We could set something like that up > fairly easily. A definite aye vote, though perhaps that's an overkill. As long as we're comparing other Free Software projects, let me just note that on linux-kernel, patches are part of the regular discussion. Whoever feels like it, runs a modified kernel, and reports the result. Patches are then chosen (in part) by the responses of people who have tried them out -- a very good QA mechanism. Just to brainstorm about the process. -- Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. INTERNET: Learn what you know. Share what you don't.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4