Tim Peters <tim_one@email.msn.com>:
> > ...
> > The solution can be the same as what Algol used: 'if' outside
> > parentheses is a statement, and inside parentheses is an expression.
> > It's a bit of a grammar rearrangement, but totally unambiguous.
>
> If I didn't know better <wink>, I'd say there's an actual consensus here:
> it seems we would all agree to "(if cond then true else false)" spelling.
> Not to be overlooked is Christian's enhancement, allowing "elif" too (beats
> all heck out of guessing how ?: nests!).
>
> Eric, are you also in agreement?
I'm not sure. I'm concerned that this syntax will actually be more
viually confusing that ?:. That having been said, I am more interested
in having ternary-select be in the language than I am in arguing about its
exact syntax.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty,
will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest.
-- From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4