On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:03:04AM -0800, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:17:08AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with that view either, but mostly because there > > is a non-GPL replacement for parts of the readline API: > > > > http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/downloads/editline.html > > It doesn't work with the current readline module. It is much > smaller than readline and works just as well in my experience. > Would there be any interest in including a copy with the standard > distribution? The license is quite nice (X11 type). Definately +1 from here. Readline reminds me of the cold war, for some reason. (Actually, multiple reasons ;) I don't have time to do it myself, unfortunately, or I would. (Looking at editline has been on my TODO list for a while... :P) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4