A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-December/010992.html below:

[Python-Dev] Splitting up _cursesmodule

[Python-Dev] Splitting up _cursesmoduleThomas Wouters thomas@xs4all.net
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 01:05:34 +0100
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:03:31PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I don't think that is a very safe bet.  Python 2.0 missed the Debian
> > Potato boat.
> 
> This may have had to do more with the unresolved GPL issues.

This is very likely. Debian is very licence -- or at least GPL -- aware.
Which is a pity, really, because I already prefer it over RedHat in all
other cases (and RedHat is also pretty licence aware, just less piously,
devoutly, beyond-practicality-IMHO dedicated to the GPL.)

> > I have no idea when Woody is expected to be released but I expect it may
> > take longer than that if history is any indication.

BTW, I believe Debian uses a fairly steady release schedule, something like
an unstable->stable switch every year or 6 months or so ? I seem to recall
seeing something like that on the debian website, but can't check right now.

> And who or what is Woody?

Woody is Debian's current development branch, the current bearer of the
alias 'unstable'. It'll become Debian 2.3 (I believe, I don't pay attention
to version numbers, I just run unstable :) once it's stabilized. 'potato' is
the previous development branch, and currently the 'stable' branch. You can
compare them with 'rawhide' and 'redhat-7.0', respectively :)

(With the enormous difference that you can upgrade your debian install to a
new version (even the devel version, or update your machine to the latest
devel snapshot) while you are using it, without having to reboot ;)

Note to the debian-pythoneers: woody still carries Python 1.5.2, not 2.0.
Someone created a separate set of 2.0-packages, but they didn't include
readline and gdbm support because of the licencing issues. (Posted on c.l.py
sometime this week.) I'm *almost* tempted enough to learn enough about
dpkg/.deb files to build my own licence-be-damned set, but it'd be a lot of
work to mirror the current debian 1.5.2 set of packages (which include
numeric, imaging, mxTools, GTK/GNOME, and a shitload of 3rd party modules)
in 2.0. Ponder, maybe it could be done semi-automatically, from the
src-deb's of those packages.

By the way, in woody, there are 52 packages with 'python' in the name, and
32 with 'perl' in the name... Pity all of my perl-hugging hippy-friends are
still blindly using RedHat, and refuse to listen to my calls from the
Debian/Python-dark-side :-)

Oh, and the names 'woody' and 'potato' came from the movie Toy Story, in
case you wondered ;)

-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4