> Sorry, all this proposal does is change the default encoding on > conversions from UTF-8 to Latin-1. That's very > western-culture-centric. That decision was made by ISO and the Unicode consortium, not me. I don't know why, and I don't really care -- I'm arguing that strings should contain characters, just like the language reference says, and that all characters should be from the same character repertoire and use the same character codes. From the user's perspective, that's the way it's done in Perl, Tcl, XML, Java, and Windows. But alright, I give up. I've wasted way too much time on this, my patches were rejected, and nobody seems to care. Not exactly inspiring. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4