> Greg Ewing posted a patch to c.l.py that implemented a good start on the > proposal. But nobody has pushed it. I had hoped to, but ran out of time; > not sure Guido even knows about Greg's patch. I vaguely remember, but not really. We did use his f(*args, **kwargs) patches as a starting point for a 1.6 feature though -- if the list comprehensions are in a similar state, they'd be great to start but definitely need work. > Perhaps the 1.6 source distribution could contain a new "intriguing > experimental patches" directory? Greg's list-comp and Christian's Stackless > have enough fans that this would probably be appreciated. Perhaps some > other things too, if we all run out of time (thinking mostly of Vladimir's > malloc cleanup and NeilS's gc). Perhaps a webpage woule make more sense? There's no point in loading every download with this. And e.g. stackless evolves at a much faster page than core Python. I definitely want Vladimir's patches in -- I feel very guilty for not having reviewed his latest proposal yet. I expect that it's right on the mark, but I understand if Vladimir wants to wait with preparing yet another set of patches until I'm happy with the design... --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4