> It is more than this. In my last shot at this, pystone ran about half as > fast. There are a few things that will be different this time around, but > it certainly won't in the "few percent" range. Interesting thought: according to patches recently posted to patches@python.org (but not yet vetted), "turning on" threads on Win32 in regular Python also slows down Pystone considerably. Maybe it's not so bad? Maybe those patches contain a hint of what we could do? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4