[Fredrik Lundh] > not sure what you're talking about here, so I suppose > we're talking past each other. Nah, I guess it was a simple case of you being right and me being wrong. (In other words, you've convinced me) [Moshe] > FWIW, the Gtk+ signal mechanism has 3-4 different disconnects, > and it might not be a bad idea, now that I think of it. [Fredrik Lundh] > you really hate keeping things as simple as possible, > don't you? ;-) > > what are these 3-4 "disconnects" doing? gtk_signal_disconnect -- disconnect by cookie gtk_signal_disconnect_by_func -- disconnect by function pointer gtk_signal_disconnect_by_data -- disconnect by the void* pointer passed Hey, you asked <wink> just-preparing-for-my-lecture-next-friday-ly y'rs, Z. (see www.linux.org.il for more) -- Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html http://www.linux.org.il -- we put the penguin in .com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4