Greg Stein: > Nevertheless, adding more moderators is the "proper" answer to the > problem. Even if it is difficult to get more moderators into the system, > there doesn't seem to be a better alternative. I agree with this. What would be helpful would be (i) a web interface for multiple-moderator moderation (which I believe Mailman already provides), and (ii) some rather simple changes to the list-to-newsgroup gateway to do some header manipulations before posting each approved message to c.l.py.a. I've been more or less "off the Net" for almost two months now, while getting started at my new job, and I will try to do some (summary-style) retro-moderation of the ca. 50 c.l.py.a submissions that I missed during this time. Automating the submission process and getting additional moderators would make c.l.py.a less dependent on me and avoid such moderation lags in the future. (And yes, of course, I'm sorry for the lag. But now I'm back, and I'm willing to help change the process so that such lags won't happen again in the future. Getting additional moderators would likely help with this.) Yours, Markus.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4