David Ascher wrote:
> > What is wrong with encoding ]]> in the XML way by using an extra
> > CDATA. In other words split up the CDATA section into two in the
> > middle of the ]]> sequence:
> >
> > import string
> > def encode_cdata(str):
> > return '<![CDATA[' + \
> > string.join(string.split(str, ']]>'), ']]]]><![CDATA[>')) + \
> > ']]>'
>=20
> If I understand what you're proposing, you're splitting a single bit =
of
> Python code into N XML elements.
nope. CDATA sections are used to encode data, they're not
elements:
XML 1.0, section 2.7:
CDATA sections may occur anywhere character data may
occur; they are used to escape blocks of text containing
characters which would otherwise be recognized as mark-
up.
you can put each data character in its own CDATA section,
if you like. if the parser cannot handle that, it's broken.
(if you've used xmllib, think handle_data, not start_cdata).
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4