On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> >>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
>
> GvR> Actually, it's okay to do this on an "as-neeed" basis. I'm
> GvR> also in favor of changing all the K&R code to ANSI, and
> GvR> getting rid of Py_PROTO and friends. Cleaner code!
>
> I agree, and here's yet another plea for moving to 4-space indents in
> the C code. For justification, look at the extended call syntax hacks
> in ceval.c. They essentially /use/ 4si because they have no choice!
>
> Let's clean it up in one fell swoop! Obviously not for 1.6. I
> volunteer to do all three mutations.
Why not for 1.6? These changes are pretty brain-dead ("does it compile?")
and can easily be reviewed.
If somebody out there happens to have the time to work up ANSI C patches,
then why refuse them?
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4