Paul Prescod wrote: > My vote is all or nothing. Either the whole file is in UCS-2 (for > example) or none of it is. agreed. > In what sense is Latin-1 not Unicode? Isn't it just the first 256 > characters of Unicode or something like that? yes. ISO Latin-1 is unicode. what MAL really meant was that the interpreter would only deal with 8-bit (traditional) or 16-bit (unicode) strings. (in my string type proposals, the same applies to text strings manipulated by the user. if it's not unicode, it's a byte array, and methods expecting text don't work) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4