On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@mojam.com> writes: > > Ken> We haven't even seen a satisfactory approach to referring to > Ken> the function, itself, from within the function. Maybe it's not > Ken> even desirable to be able to do that - that's an interesting > Ken> question. > > SM> I hereby propose that within a function the special name __ > SM> refer to the function. > > I think the syntax is fairly obscure. I'm neurtral on the whole idea > of having a special way to get at the function object from within the > body of the code. I agree. > Also, the proposal to handle security policies using attributes > attached to the function seems wrong. This isn't the only application of function attributes. Can't throw them out because one use seems wrong :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4