Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/003564.html below:

[Python-Dev] voting (was: Object customization)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Object customization (was: Arbitrary attributes on funcs and methods)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Object customization (was: Arbitrary attributes on funcs and methods)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> TimBot wrote:
> > Greg gave the voting rule as:
> > 
> > >    -1  "Veto. And <HERE> is my reasoning."
> 
> sorry, I must have missed that post, since I've
> interpreted the whole thing as:
> 
>     if reduce(operator.add, list_of_votes) > 0 and guido_likes_it():
>         implement(feature)

As in all cases, that "and" should be an "or" :-)

> (probably because I've changed the eff-bot script
> to use 'sre' instead of 're'...)
> 
> can you repost the full set of rules?

http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-March/004312.html


Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Object customization (was: Arbitrary attributes on funcs and methods)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Object customization (was: Arbitrary attributes on funcs and methods)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4