Ken Manheimer <klm@digicool.com> wrote: > > does anyone that has learned about the LGB rule expect > > the above to work? >=20 > Not sure what LGB stands for. "Local / Global / Built-in"? certain bestselling python books are known to use this acronym... > I'm assuming your hypothetical foo.x means the attribute 'x' of the > function 'foo' in the global namespace for the function 'foo' - which, = > conveniently, is the module where foo is defined! did you run the eff() bot() example? > I must be misapprehending what you're suggesting - i know you know = this > stuff better than i do - but it seems to me that foo.x would work, = were > foo to have an x. sure, it seems to be working. but not for the right reason. > (And that foo.x would, in my esteem, be a suboptimal > way to get at x from within foo, but that's besides the fact.) fwiw, I'd love to see a good syntax for this. might even change my mind... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4