Ken Manheimer wrote: > I want function attributes. (There are all sorts of occasions i need = cues > to classify functions for executives that map and apply them, and this > seems like the perfect way to couple that information with the > object. Much nicer than having to mangle the names of the functions, = or > create some external registry with the classifications.) how do you expect to find all methods that has a given attribute? > And i think i'd want them even more if they were visible within the > function, so i could do static variables. Why is that a bad thing? because it doesn't work, unless you change python in a backwards incompatible way. that's okay in py3k, it's not okay in 1.6. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4