[Tim] > Yes, of course people will use it to get the effect of function > statics. OK by me. People do the same thing today with class data > attributes (i.e., to [Andrew M. Kuchling] > Wait, the attributes added to a function are visible inside the > function? No, same as in JavaScript, you need funcname.attr, just as you need classname.attr in Python today to fake the effect of mutable class statics (in the C++ sense). > [hysteria deleted <wink>] > ... > +0 if they're not.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4