On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > Looks like the proposed changed to PyObject_Compare matches E for your > example. The printed representation doesn't match, but I'm not sure > that is as important. Very, very cool. Well done. Say, when did printing get fixed? > >>> tight = [1, None, "x"] > >>> tight[1] = tight > >>> tight > [1, [...], 'x'] -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4