[Ping] > But you're right, i've never heard of another language that can handle > configurable encodings right in the source code. [The eff-bot] > XML? [Ping] > Don't get me started. XML is not a language. It's a serialization > format for trees (isomorphic to s-expressions, but five times more > verbose). It has no semantics. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise > is probably a marketing drone or has been brainwashed by the buzzword > brigade. Of coursem but "everything is a tree". If you put Python in XML by having the parse-tree serialized, then you can handle any encoding in the source file, by snarfing it from XML. not-in-favour-of-Python-in-XML-but-this-is-sure-to-encourage-Greg-Wilson-ly y'rs, Z. -- Moshe Zadka <mzadka@geocities.com>. http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html http://www.linux.org.il -- we put the penguin in .com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4