Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/003353.html below:

[Python-Dev] Extensible library packages

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Extensible library packages
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python for small platforms
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

Andrew M. Kuchling:
[...]
> The problem is that, if the Python standard library includes a package
> named 'xml', ...
[...]
> Can anyone suggest a good solution?  Fixing this may not require
> changing the core in any way, but the cleanest solution isn't obvious.

I dislike the idea of having user visible packages in the standard 
library too.  

As Fredrik already suggested, putting a file 'saxlib.py' into the lib,
which exposes all what a user needs to know about 'sax' seems to be the 
best solution.

Regards, Peter

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Extensible library packages
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python for small platforms
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4