Vladimir Marangozov wrote:
>
> Christian Tismer wrote:
> >
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > ...
> > > The function name is not taken into account for the comparison. Maybe
> > > it should?
> >
> > Absolutely, please!
>
> Honestly, no. -O is used for speed, so showing the wrong symbols is
> okay. It's the same in C.
Not ok, IMHO. If the name is not guaranteed to be valid, why
should it be there at all? If I write code that relies on
inspecting those things, then I'm hosed.
I'm the last one who argues against optimization.
But I'd use either no name at all, or a tuple with all folded names.
ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4