Greg Stein wrote: > I don't recall the termination of the discussion, but I don't know = that > consensus was ever reached. iirc, Ping liked it, but I'm not sure anybody else contributed much to that thread... (and to neutralize Ping, just let me say that I don't like it :-) > Personally, I find this of little value over the similar (not exact) = code: >=20 > def supplement(dict, extra): > d =3D extra.copy() > d.update(dict) > return d has anyone benchmarked this? for some reason, I doubt that the difference between copy/update and supplement is that large... > Another view: why keep adding methods to service all possible needs? exactly. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4