[Peter Funk]
> -1 for C reformatting. The 4 space intendation seesm reasonable for
> Python sources, but I disaggree for C code. C is not Python.
Code is code. The project I work on professionally is a half million lines
of C++, and 4-space indents are rigidly enforced -- works great. It makes
just as much sense for C as for Python, and for all the same reasons. The
one formal study I've seen on this showed that comprehension levels peaked
at indent levels of 3 and 4, dropping off on both sides.
However, tabs in C is one of Guido's endearing inconsistencies, and we don't
want to lose the only two of those he has <wink> (his other is trying to
avoid curly braces whenever possible in C, perhaps out of the same perverse
sense of pride I used to take in avoiding redundant semicolons in Pascal
<;{} wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4