M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > ... > Seems that we're a bit too healthy (see MarkH's post) sometimes, > i.e. there isn't all that much room for experiments. Just think > of cool developments like Chris' stackless python. Experience shows > that these kind of things will never make it into the distribution. A portion of my threading patches went into 1.5. "Big" things can happen and they do... it's just a matter of passing muster with The Head Honcho. That, and the timing (e.g. the thread state changes wouldn't go into a 1.4.n release, but did go into 1.5). > Unfortunately, maintaing patches to the dist across releases a real > pain and much work, so these ideas will just sit there unused and > untested. Much the same happened to gcc ... in the end corporate > strength made egcs possible. Perhaps we need such a branch too ? NO -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4