> The BSD-ish license that Python has always used is much more preferable. I > dislike the regulation of the "Python" name, the requirement to > prominently discuss modifications made, and the revocation clause. same here. reading the new one made me feel very uneasy, but I cannot really say much about it before I've discussed it with people who know more about this... just a few small notes: the BSD-ish license used up to now has been a major selling argument for Python, while this one seems to really push the bounds of what qualifies as an open source license... (it also seems to imply that Python is a trademark, which is, as far as I can tell, is not true at this time. and archive corporation/seagate already owns the trademark wrt. software). the worst thing is that we will have to run this by our lawyers before we can decide whether to continue contributing to 1.6 development :-( </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4