> So I started looking around at the versions and dates of various copies of > asynchat.py. Here's what I found: > > source version number:date owner > Python 1.5.2 1.2:1999/06/18 guido > Python CVS 1.2:1999/06/18 guido > Zope 1.? 1.7:1999/04/09 amos > Zope 2.0 1.9:1999/07/19 amos > Medusa 990902 2.24:1999/07/07 rushing > > What's apparently been happening is that people have picked up asyncore and > asynchat at various time and stuck them in their own CVS repositories > without somehow freezing the Id string of the version they originally got > from Sam Rushing. It's not clear what the differences are until you compare > the actual files. It turns out that the Zope 2.0 and Medusa versions have > no content differences, only wildly different version numbers. The Medusa > and Python CVS versions only have one difference: > > if index > 0: > # don't bother reporting the empty string (source of subtle bugs) > self.collect_incoming_data (self.ac_in_buffer[:index]) > > which *may* be what's causing my problems (note the IndexError in my > traceback). My bad. I despise putting RCS identifiers in code I release, but I don't always freeze them before incorporating other people's code in my CVS tree. I will fix this if I can and I promise to try not to repeat this mistake in the future. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4