[Greg] > ... > Somebody proposes that a person is added to the list of people with > checkin privileges. If nobody else in the group vetoes that, then ? they're in ... [Guido] > This makes sense, but I have one concern: if somebody who isn't liked > very much (say a capable hacker who is a real troublemaker) asks for > privileges, would people veto this? It seems that a key point in Greg's description is that people don't propose *themselves* for checkin. They have to talk someone else into proposing them. That should keep Endang out of the running for a few years <wink>. After that, I care more about their code than their personalities. If the stuff they check in is good, fine; if it's not, lock 'em out for direct cause. > I'd be reluctant to go on record as veto'ing a particular person. Secret Ballot run off a web page -- although not so secret you can't see who voted for what <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4