On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:54:15 +1100, you wrote: >This is leading me to conclude that our "codec registry" should be the >file system, and Python modules. > >Would it be possible to define a "standard package" called >"encodings", and when we need an encoding, we simply attempt to load a >module from that package? The key benefits I see are: [snip] >Is this worthy of consideration? Exactly what I am aiming for. The real icing on the cake would be a small state machine or some helper functions in C which made it possible to write fast codecs in pure Python, but that can come a bit later when we have examples up and running. - Andy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4